Weed control with diclosulam in soybean

Authors

  • Artem Sergeevich Golubev Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection” (FSBSI VIZR)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2021.v33.i3.2644

Keywords:

diclosulam, efficacy, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, soybean, weed

Abstract

The experiments were conducted in 2017-2018 on soybean (Glycine max L.) in three climatic regions of Russia (Altai Region, Krasnodar Region and Astrakhan Region) to evaluate efficacy of herbicide diclosulam (WG, 750 g/kg). Treatments included diclosulam: 1) applied preemergence (PRE) - 18.75 and 37.5 g i.a. ha-1; 2) applied postemergence (POST) at 1-3 leaves of soybeans (BBCH 11-13) - 11.25 and 22.5 g i.a. ha-1. Monocotyledonous weeds (Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) Beauv. and Panicum miliaceum ssp. ruderale (Kitagawa) Tzvelev) had low sensitivity to diclosulam. Diclosulam efficacy at minimum application rate against Fallоpia convolvulus (L.) A. Love and Solanum nigrum L. was 100%. Adjuvant ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol (EIAb) was added to diclosulam to increase treatment efficiency against Chenopodium album L., Amaranthus retroflexus L., Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., Persicaria maculosa S.F. Gray.  EIAb with diclosulam was the most effective at minimum application rate. Application of diclosulam did not cause phytotoxicity on 3 soybean cultivars Altom, Bara and Vilana. The maximum increase of soybean yield after herbicide treatment was observed in Krasnodar Region in 2018 at cultivar Bara (+ 9.2 centners per hectare).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Besler, B., W. Grichar, S. Senseman, R. Lemon and T. Baughman. 2008. Effects of row pattern configurations and reduced (1/2×) and full rates (1×) of imazapic and diclosulam for control of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) in peanut. Weed Technol. 22: 558-562.
Braz, G., R. Oliveira, L. Zobiole, R. Rubin, C. Voglewede, J. Constantin and H. Takano. 2017. Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) control in no-tillage soybean with diclosulam plus halauxifen-methyl. Weed Technol. 31: 184-192.
Brecke, B., G. Wehtje and K. Paudel. 2002. Comparison between diclosulam - and imazapic-based weed control systems in peanut. Peanut Sci. 29: 52-57.
Brighenti, A. M., V. J. Moraes, J. R. S. de Oliveira, D. L. P. Gazzieiro, A. L. L. Barroso and J. A. Gomes. 2002. Persistência e fitotoxicidade de herbicidas aplicados na soja sobre o girassol em sucessão. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 37: 559-565.
Chandi, A., D. Jordan, A. York and B. Lassiter. 2012. Confirmation and management of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) resistant to diclosulam. Weed Technol. 26: 29-36.
Clewis, S., S. Askew and J. Wilcut. 2002. Economic assessment of diclosulam and flumioxazin in strip- and conventional-tillage peanut. Weed Sci. 50: 378-385.
Constantin, J., D. F. Biffe, R. S. Jr. de Oliveira, E. L. Rosa, E. A. Gheno, F. G. Machado and G. B. P. Braz. 2018. Use of residual herbicides in soybean and impact on corn in succession. Comun. Sci. 9: 481-491.
Ducar, J., S. Clewis, J. Wilcut, D. Jordan, B. Brecke, W. Grichar, W. Johnson and G. Wehtje, 2009. Weed management using reduced rate combinations of diclosulam, flumioxazin, and imazapic in peanut. Weed Technol. 23: 236-242.
Fornazza, F. G. F., J. Constantin, F. G. Machado, R. S. Jr. de Oliveira, G. D. da Silva and F. A. Rios. 2018. Selectivity of pre-and post-emergence herbicides to very-early maturing soybean cultivars. Comun. Sci. 9: 649-658.
Gallon, M., M. M. Trezzi, F. B. Jr. Pagnoncelli, R. Pasini, M. Viecelli, and B. M. Cavalheiro. 2019. Chemical management of broadleaf buttonweed and brazilian pusley in different application methods. Planta Daninha, 37: e019185625.
Gazola, T., M. Dias, D. Belapart, E. Castro and L. Bianchi. 2016. Efeitos do diclosulam na soja cultivada em solos de diferentes classes texturais. Rev. Bras. Herb. 15: 353-361.
Grey, T. L. and E. P. Prostko 2015. Uptake, translocation, and dose response of postemergence applied diclosulam to bristly starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum). Peanut Sci. 42: 23-29.
Grey, T. L., D. C. Bridges, E. P. Prostko, E. F. Eastin, W. C. Johnson, W. K. Vencill, B. J. Brecke, G. E. MacDonald, J. A. Treadaway-Ducar, J. W. Everest, G. R. Wehtje and J. W. Wilcut. 2003. Residual weed control with imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin in southeastern peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 30: 22-27.
Grey, T. and G. Wehtje, 2005. Residual herbicide weed control systems in peanut. Weed Technol. 19: 560-567.
Grey, T., D. Bridges, H. Hancock and J. Davis. 2004. Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control. Weed Technol. 18: 619-625.
Grichar, J., B. Besler, K. Brewer and V. Langston 2004. Using diclosulam in a weed control program for peanut in South Texas. Crop Prot. 23: 1145-1149.
Grichar, W. J. 2007. Horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum), smellmelon (Cucumis melo), and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in peanut with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 21: 688-691.
Grichar, W. J., P. A. Dotray, B. A. Besler and V. B. Langston. 2006. Weed control programs in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with diclosulam and ethalfluralin combinations. Tex. J. Agric. Nat. Resour. 19: 62-71.
Jakhar, R. R. and R. Sharma. 2015. Growth and yield attributes as influenced by integrated weed management in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Adv. Res. J. Crop Improv. 6: 129-133.
Kalsing, A., C. V. S. Rossi, F. R. Lucio, G. B. Minozzi, F. P. Gonçalves and R. Valeriano, 2020. Efficacy of control of glyphosate-tolerant species of the Rubiaceae family through double-knockdown applications. Planta Daninha. 38: e020190700.
Krenchinski, F. H., V. G. C. Pereira, L. H. S. Zobiole, A. J. P. Albrecht, L. P. Albrecht and M. Peterson. 2019. Halauxifen-methyl + diclosulam: new option to control Conyza spp. prior soybean sowing. Planta Daninha. 37: e019189000.
Lancaster, S., J. Beam, J. Lanier, D. Jordan and P. Johnson. 2007a. Weed and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to diclosulam applied POST. Weed Technol. 21: 618-622.
Lancaster, S., J. Beam, J. Lanier, D. Jordan and P. Johnson. 2007b. Compatibility of diclosulam with postemergence herbicides and fungicides. Weed Technol. 21: 869-872.
Leite, C. R. F., J. C. V. Almeida and C. E. C. Prete, 2000. Sensibilidade de cultivares de soja (Glycine max) aos herbicidas diclosulam e flumetsulam. Planta Daninha. 18: 103-122
Matte, W. D., S. D. Cavalieri, C. S. Pereira, F. S. Ikeda and W. B. Costa 2019. Residual activity of diclosulam applied to soybean on cotton crop in succession. Planta Daninha, 37: e019181370.
Mendes, K. F., G. P. Olivatto, R. N. de Sousa, L. V. Junqueira and V. L. Tornisielo. 2019. Natural biochar effect on sorption-desorption and mobility of diclosulam and pendimethalin in soil. Geoderma. 347: 118-125.
Mendes, R. R., J. R. S. Oliveira, J. Constantin, V. F. V. Silva and J. R. Hencks, 2019. Identification and mapping of cross-resistance patterns to ALS-inhibitors in greater beggarticks (Bidens spp.). Planta Daninha. 37: e019192481.
Monquero, P. A., M. C. Côrrea, L. N. Barbosa, A. Gutierrez, I. Orzari and A. C. S. Hirata. 2013. Seleção de espécies de adubos verdes visando à fitorremediação de diclosulam. Planta Daninha. 31: 127-135.
Nainwal, R. C., S. C. Saxena and V. P. Singh. 2010. Effect of pre-and post-emergence herbicides on weed infestation and productivity of soybean. Indian J. Weed Sci. 42: 17-20.
Obiole, L. H. S., F. H. Krenchinski, G. R. Pereira, P. E. Rampazzo, R. S. Rubin and F. R. Lucio. 2018. Management programs to control Conyza spp. in pre-soybean sowing applications. Planta Daninha. 36: e018175883.
Price, A. and J. Wilcut. 2002. Weed management with diclosulam in strip-tillage peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 16: 29-36.
Price, K., X. Li and A. Price. 2020. Cover crop response to residual herbicides in peanut-cotton rotation. Weed Technol. 34: 534-539.
Prostko, E. P. and T. M. Webster. 2015. Field corn response to diclosulam. Crop. Forage Turfgrass Manag. 1: cftm2015.0134.
Reddy, K. 2000. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with cloransulam and diclosulam. Weed Technol. 14: 293-297.
Ribeiro, S. R. S., J. F. L. Leal, A. S. Souza, J. Borella, G. S. Carvalho, C. V. L. Pereira and C.F. Pinho. 2019. Watermelon sensitivity to residual of pre-emergent herbicide applied in soybean crop. Rev. Bras. Herb. 18: e. 669.
Santin, C. O., E. Giacomin, L. Galon, A. D. Menegat, E. R. Rossetto, M. B. Franceschetti, M. A. Bagnara, A. M. Silva, R. J. Tonin, L. Brunetto and C. T. Forte. 2019. Association of herbicides for management of weed plants in pre-emergence of soybean culture. J. Agric. Sci. 11: 217-224.
Scott, G., S. Askew and J. Wilcut. 2001. Economic evaluation of diclosulam and flumioxazin systems in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15: 360-364.
Singh, S. P., V. P. Singh, R.C. Nainwal, N. Tripathi and A. Kumar. 2009. Efficacy of diclosulam on weeds and yield of soybean. Indian J. Weed Sci. 41: 170-173.
Souza, A. S., J. F. L. Leal, A. C. Langaro, F. C. Silva, C. C. B. Souza, M. G. Pereira and C. F. Pinho. 2019. Interference of soil compaction on diclosulam residual. Rev. Bras. Herb. 18: e. 687.
Willingham, S., B. Brecke, J. Treadaway-Ducar, and G. MacDonald. 2008. Utility of Reduced rates of diclosulam, flumioxazin, and imazapic for weed management in peanut. Weed Technol. 22: 74-80.
Zabik, J., I. van Wesenbeeck, A. Peacock, L. Kennard and D.W. Roberts. 2001. Terrestrial field dissipation of diclosulam at four sites in the United States. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49: 3284-3290.
Grey, T. L., D. C. Bridges and E. F. Eastin. 2001. Influence of application rate and timing of diclosulam on weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci. 28: 13-19.
Everman, W., S. Clewis, Z. Taylor and J. Wilcut, 2006. Influence of diclosulam postemergence application timing on weed control and peanut tolerance. Weed Technol. 20: 651-657.

Published

2021-04-13

How to Cite

Golubev, A. S. “Weed Control With Diclosulam in Soybean”. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, vol. 33, no. 3, Apr. 2021, pp. 187-93, doi:10.9755/ejfa.2021.v33.i3.2644.

Issue

Section

Research Article