COMPARISON OF TRANSFORMATION EFFICIENCY OF FIVE AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS STRAINS IN NICOTIANA TABACUM L.

Authors

  • Allah Bakhsh Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ankara, 06110 Diskapi-Altindag, Turkey
  • Emine Anayol Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ankara, 06110 Diskapi-Altindag, Turkey
  • Sancar Fatih Ozcan Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ankara, 06110 Diskapi-Altindag, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v26i3.16437

Keywords:

Plant transformation, Efficient agro strains, Comparison, Genetic transfer

Abstract

Agrobacterium mediated transformation has been widely used for research in plant molecular biology and for genetic improvement of crops exploiting its tremendous ability to transfer foreign DNA to plants. In this study, the transformation efficiency of five Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains GV2260, LBA4404, AGL1, EHA105, and C58C1 was evaluated in Nicotiana tabacum L. cultivar Samsun. The Agrobacterium strains contained the recombinant binary vector pBin19 harboring beta-glucuronidase uidA gene under 35S promoter. Neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) gene was used as a selectable marker at a concentration of 100 mg L-1 kanamycin. The expression of uidA gene in regenerated T0 plants was firstly analyzed by GUS histochemical analyses and later on confirmation of presence of the nptII and uidA genes in regenerated plants was determined by PCR. The highest transformation rate (20%) was obtained with the Agrobacterium strain LBA4404, followed by EHA105, GV2260, C58C1 and AGL1. The higher transformation efficiency achieved in our studies make LBA4404 Agrobacterium strain optimal for functional genomics and biotechnological applications in tobacco plants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-10-27

How to Cite

Bakhsh, A., E. Anayol, and S. F. Ozcan. “COMPARISON OF TRANSFORMATION EFFICIENCY OF FIVE AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS STRAINS IN NICOTIANA TABACUM L”. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, vol. 26, no. 3, Oct. 2017, pp. 259-64, doi:10.9755/ejfa.v26i3.16437.

Issue

Section

Regular Articles